Page 225 - Vitamin D and Cancer
P. 225

212                                       F.S.G. Cheung and J.K.V. Reichardt


                Genetic background:  Age, culture, vitamin D   UV exposure
                VDR Polymorphisms    intake, medical condition:,
                                     Elderly
                                     Veiled women
                                     Natural vitamin D intake
                          Vitamin D   Vitamin D supplement
                         analogues   Organ transplant recipients
                                     Xerodoma pigmentosum



                 Genomic and non genomic pathways:
                                 D -VDR-RXR
                 Formation of 1,25(OH) 2 3              Vitamin D
                 complex to induce gene expression        levels
                 Rapid membrane receptor signaling
                 pathways


                Classical functions:  Non classical/ Anti-  DNA damage:
                Maintaining adequate  cancer effects:     CPD formation
                blood calcium levels  Anti-proliferation  Oxidative damage
                Bone mineralization  Pro-differentiation
                                     Photoprotection

                                                       Skin cancer
                                                       development

            Fig. 9.3  Vitamin D and skin cancer. UV radiation can cause DNA damage that can lead to skin cancer.
            However, the vitamin D level in our body is also dependant on UV radiation induced vitamin D syn-
            thesis as well as our vitamin intake from food sources. The amount of vitamin D synthesized from UV
            exposure is influenced by the age, culture, and existing medical conditions of the individual. Genetic
            variants of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) can influence the ability of vitamin D to elicit its biological
            actions. Vitamin D in the body can carry out classical functions such as mineral and bone homeostasis
            as well as non classical functions that can result in anti-cancer effects. Thus the balance of UV exposure
            in causing DNA damage and vitamin D synthesis determines the risk of skin cancer



            Achknowledgments  We thank Lucia Musumeci and Cheng Li (The University of Sydney) for
            their helpful contributions and Bruce Armstrong (The University of Sydney) for his helpful discus-
            sions and comments on this chapter. The work in the lab of JKVR was supported by NCI grant P01
            CA108964 (Project 1). JKVR is also a Medical Foundation Fellow at The University of Sydney.



            References

              1. Alagbala AA, Johnson CS, Trump DL et al (2006) Antitumor effects of two less-calcemic
               vitamin  D  analogs  (Paricalcitol  and  QW-1624F2–2)  in  squamous  cell  carcinoma  cells.
               Oncology 70(6):483–492
              2. Anderson PH, Hendrix I, Sawyer RK et al (2008) Co-expression of CYP27B1 enzyme with
               the  1.5  kb  CYP27B1  promoter-luciferase  transgene  in  the  mouse.  Mol  Cell  Endocrinol
               285(1–2):1–9
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230