Page 154 -
P. 154

W hy  Y ou Should Invest in Real Esta te

                   that actually falls below unleveraged yields, and in some areas, fi nancing a
                   property can even create negative cash fl ows.
                       To illustrate, let’s assume that our $200,000 duplex yields a 5 percent
                     unleveraged rather than a 7.5 percent unleveraged return. Here are the new
                   numbers:

                           Net income (.05   $200,000)              $10,000
                         Debt service ($160,000, 6%, 30 years)      $11,264

                         Cash flow less debt service                 ($ 1,264)
                         Leveraged yield from income (R)             1,264/$40,000
                         R                                           3.16%



                            Does it make sense to buy and finance a rental property that produces
                   these kinds of adverse numbers? Maybe.
                       Remember, to accurately evaluate any type of investment, compute  total
                   expected returns. Income contributes an important role, but also count other
                   members of the cast.
                       How rapidly do you expect rents to climb? Can you boost net rental
                     income through better management of the property? Can you convert the

                   property to a more profitable use (e.g., rental apartments to condominiums)?
                   How much will amortization (mortgage paydown), appreciation, and infl a-
                   tion add to your gains? How much tax shelter does the property provide?
                       When I started my career in real estate, investors applied this buying
                   rule: “Pay for the present, get the future for free.” If we couldn’t get a prop-
                   erty to yield a leveraged cash-on-cash return of 15 percent to 30 percent
                   (depending on the quality of the property and its tenants), we passed on the
                   deal. We expected large additional returns from the other sources just cited,
                   but we considered those gains “gravy.” We only paid for the “meat and pota-
                   toes” (current income).
                       Unfortunately, those glorious days no longer exist. Today, you may
                   have to pay for the future. But given the generous future rewards you can
                   expect—especially when contrasted to the relatively poor yields for stocks and

                   bonds—even currently negative cash flows can make sense when the other
                   sources of property gains listed earlier look good.

                           Wealth from Amortization

                     When investors think property, they generally want positive cash fl ow  and

                   appreciation, and over time, most rental properties fulfill these wants.

                                                  131






                                                                                   8/23/07   3:18:15 PM
          c13.indd   131
          c13.indd   131                                                           8/23/07   3:18:15 PM
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159