Page 116 - 2
P. 116

TR U M P  STR A TEGI ES  FO R  R E A L  ESTA TE


                       In many cases, you should welcome a deadlock because it clearly
                   shows your determination to the other side. A deadlock also tests the
                   other parties’ determination. If they say, “That’s something I
                   refuse to accept and I’m leaving,” see iftheyactuallygooutand
                   stay out. Often if you call their bluff, they will retreat and accept
                   your position or suggest an alternative. Try to orchestrate a way for
                   them to gracefully come backtothe table and accept your position
                   or suggest an alternative, without losing face. If the other side ac-
                   cepts a deadlock it proves to you andyoursidethat “it’s the end of
                   the road” on that issue, though not necessarily the whole deal.



                   Breaking Deadlocks


                   One way to break a deadlock is simply to change the subject that
                   caused the deadlock and shift to other areas. The issue may still be
                   unresolved but if agreement is reached on other items the mood may
                   be changed and the deadlock issue can be revisited in a more amica-
                   ble environment.
                       Another way to break a deadlock is to go “off the record” and try
                   to open an avenue of resolution through a different person, perhaps
                   at a different level in the opposing party’s organization. Or you can
                   offer to get the opinion of a mutually respected third party.
                       If you do intend to break a deadlock by caving in, you should at
                   least insist on getting a minor concession in an ancillary area to
                   maintain a degree of credibility.



                   Using Deadlines to Your Advantage


                   Most people wait until the last minute to resolve open issues in
                   a negotiation. An interesting experiment was undertaken by a noted
                   researcher in the field of negotiation. He assembled a group of



                                                  94
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121