Page 244 - Vitamin D and Cancer
P. 244

10  Vitamin D and Prostate Cancer                               231

              There were important differences between the four positive studies. Two of the
            positive studies showed that higher 1,25-OH  vitamin D levels were associated with
                                               2
            a protective effect against prostate cancer [90, 91]. Corder et al. had a large number
            of vitamin D deficient subjects (approximately 50%). In Li, et al. the protective
            effect of the higher 1,25-OH  vitamin D levels was a reduction in the risk of aggres-
                                  2
            sive prostate cancers. Two other studies showed a link between low 25-OH vitamin
            D levels and increased risk of prostate cancer [89, 92]. Tuohimaa et al. showed an
            increased  risk  of  prostate  cancer  with  extreme  25-OH  vitamin  D  deficiency
            (<7.6 ng/mL) but also showed an increased risk of prostate cancer with highest
            25-OH vitamin D levels suggesting a U-shaped relationship between vitamin D
            status and prostate cancer risk [92].
              This suggestion of an increased risk of prostate cancer at higher 25-OH vitamin
            D levels was reproduced in one recent study [93]. Ahn et al. found a statistically
            significant increase in risk of aggressive prostate cancers (Gleason > 7) with higher
            25-OH vitamin D levels. This possible increased risk at higher vitamin D levels has
            not been fully explained and requires further investigation.
              In the aforementioned 2007 study by Li et al., there was an increased risk of
            aggressive prostate cancer when both 1,25-OH  vitamin D and 25-OH vitamin D
                                                  2
            levels were low, but not solely with low 25-OH levels. This additive effect of low
            levels of both forms of vitamin D was also shown by Corder et al. Three of the
            studies that had positive results, demonstrating increased risk of aggressive pros-
            tate cancer, but not necessarily an increased risk of lower grade cancers [89, 91,
            93]. Of the studies that had null results, two did not analyze risk based on aggres-
            siveness [94, 99] and three had relatively small numbers of aggressive cases [95,
            96,  98].  This  may  support  a  hypothesis  that  vitamin  D  deficient  states  will
            increase the risk of aggressive prostate cancers, rather than all grades of prostate
            cancers.
              Thus, epidemiologic evidence is mixed, but generally consistent with the hypoth-
            esis that circulating 1,25-OH  vitamin D levels, and factors that influence them (i.e.,
                                   2
            oral  calcium  intake,  severe  vitamin  D  deficiency)  play  a  role  in  prostate  cancer
            development  and  its  course  [100].  There  are  multiple  preclinical  observations
            involving vitamin D and prostate cancer risk and mortality that still need further
            investigation with humans. In addition to the ongoing trials with vitamin D analogs
            in treating prostate cancer, the observation that 1-alpha-hydroxylase is reduced or
            lost in prostate cancer tissue needs further confirmation and study in humans.


            10.6   Therapeutic Applications of Vitamin D


            10.6.1   Vitamin D in Combination with Other Antineoplastic
                    Agents in Preclinical Models


            Experiments in preclinical models suggest that VDR ligands enhance the activity
            of a broad range of antineoplastic agents.
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249